At various times in the geological past, many species have become extinct as a result of natural rather than human, processes. Thus, there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Whether or not human beings are responsible for saving endangered species has raised a heated debate over society. In my view, although from many aspects that the events of extinction are out of human control, however, I assert that we should do still something to mitigate endanger species from extinction, and my analysis is shown below.
I concede that, in the long term, human beings have little liability for extinction. Considering the history, many extinctions owing to the flux of the natural; the ice age has periodically occurred in history, each of it eradicates a great number of species on the earth. Also, the strong evidence shows that the extinction of the dinosaurs, once-powerful creatures dominant the earth, are caused by the providential impact of a meteorite. These cases show that natural disaster is not the responsibility of human. In this view, the demise of the creatures is, to some extent, merely an ecological fluctuation and the natural events but nothing to do with human behaviors.
Also, extinction owing to natural selection. To be specific, according to the theory from Darwin, saying that the more powerful creatures will rule out the weaker ones. Undoubtedly, we humans are living in this competitive world; we forage other animals for living and colonize other creatures’ habitats for development. If we don’t crave for our living, we may also be substituted by other stronger species.
On the other hand, despise the inexorable events of nature, there are still several reasons or impetus for us to save endangered fauna or flora from extinction. Firstly, a sound eco-system benefits our sustainability. As we know, human beings are living in a delicate and sophisticated biosphere, every perturbation would cause profound consequences which may result in a collapse of the biosphere. For instance, plants provide a wide range of animals with food including human beings. Honey bees seem like an unimportant creature, however, it serves as a crucial role in the biosphere. It helps flora disseminating the pollen and thus making plants successfully being pollinated and ensuring the plants thrive. Once honey bees disappear, the upper-level creatures like us, will suffer from starvation and therefore not able to sustain our lives.
Moreover, many creatures are valuable for research and development which may be useful more human society. The natural world not only serves as a paradigm for use to invent new technology, but also suffices us with enormous resources for developing new medicine. From this view, every species may have potential value for the prosperity of human beings. Birds, in the previous generation, inspired Wright brothers to develop their first airplane; nowadays, some insects, are researched by scientists for investigating their air dynamic to conceive better flying machines or drones. What's more, the antibiotic is acquired from living creatures, which is an indispensable medicine in the modern world; so, how don’t we know an endangered species, may one day be found as a source of crucial medicine and saving people’s life.
To sum up, in the long term, extinction may be owing to the vicissitude of nature, we may have little power to change it. Nevertheless, in the short term, every creature has a unique position in the ecosphere. The consequence of the disappearance of the species may be serious and detrimental for humans. Also, many species are valuable for science advancement as well as helping humans to develop new medicines. Therefore, it is necessary for us to make some effort to protect endangered species.
- Facts are stubborn things They cannot be altered by our wishes our inclinations or the dictates of our passion 54
- There are two types of laws just and unjust Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey laws and even more importantly to disobey and resist unjust laws 50
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it is justifiable 50
- Humanity has made little real progress over the past century or so Technological innovations have take place but the overall condition of humanity is no better War violence and poverty are still with us Technology cannot change the condition of humanity 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not human beings are responsible for saving...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'species'?
Suggestion: species
...each of it eradicates a great number of species on the earth. Also, the strong evidence...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...world not only serves as a paradigm for use to invent new technology, but also suff...
^^^
Line 9, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ceive better flying machines or drones. Whats more, the antibiotic is acquired from l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as well as, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3043.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 577.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27383015598 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93989318257 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518197573657 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 973.8 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.797517214 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.678571429 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6071428571 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.03571428571 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161157276498 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500944265846 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347925584605 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965204928315 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266300278209 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.