Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is an important part of modern society. One of influential factors to achieve high quality of the education in university is related to professors, which are in charge of tutoring students and conducting researches. In this sense, some people claim that by raising salaries of professors, we can improve the quality in education. In my view, I agree with this notion, and my reasons are show as follows.
To begin with, increasing professors' salary can act as an incentive for them to improve their teaching quality. To be specific, just like working in an industry, the more salaries you receive, the more sense of responsibility and appreciation you feel, and thus it encourages workers to work harder and more productively. Similarly, for professors, once they feel the generous treatment from the school, they take more effort in teaching students and producing substantial research projects.
Furthermore, higher salaries mean professor can concentrate more on their work. To illustrate, for a low-income professor, he or she may need to find extra resources to sustain the sustenance such as cooperating with other unrelated company or doing part-time job outside the school. So, it will distract professor's from the teaching tasks and researches. By contrast, if professors get enough profit from school, they can focus on education full-heartly.
Besides, a better well-being of a university attracts prestigious researcher to join the university. One of the essential aspects in the university is whether they can produce substantial result of research, and professors play an important role in this goal. That is, a talented professors can hold a research project and generate fruitful results that not only benefits students-students at school can keep in contact with these researches-but, the fame results from the professors and researches will appeal more skillful students. Therefore, a positive cycle is established, which raises the school's academic level and enrolls better students. From this the quality of the education is boosted.
To sum up, I hold the notion that raising salaries for professors helps increase educational quality. It provides professors with more incentive to work harder, helps them concentrate on their goal, and form the positive cycle of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- At various times in the geological past many species have become extinct as a result of natural rather than human processes Thus there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endan 90
- It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data 16
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- Technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 58
- The function of science is to reassure the purpose of art is to upset Therein lies the value of each 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...s follows. To begin with, increasing professors salary can act as an incentive for them...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 281, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'professor'?
Suggestion: professor
... role in this goal. That is, a talented professors can hold a research project and generat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46239554318 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0914501886 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551532033426 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9226318422 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.944444444 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238095005998 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773612585525 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341910850504 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138496027951 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227579931918 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.