Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people argue that for betterment of education system, universities should fund their money on physical facilities rather than wasting money on the stipend of lecturer. They cite that library, cafeteria, dinning halls, dome rooms and computer center should be improve to proliferate the quality of academic institute. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that to enhancement the standard of education, universities should invest on the salaries for professors for following two reasons.
To commence, the academic organization should fund their money on salaries of their lecturer for giving quality academic because it contributes the professor to inspire themselves from inner heart and emit out their enthusiasm to teach their pupils in better way. To illustrate my own experience, when I was in university, one of my professors was so lethargic and indolent that he slept in classroom and always blame the universities for paying him low money. Nonetheless as the universities brings polices to mounting the salaries of instructors he was so euphoric and optimistic that he teach us so good that almost all students got full marks in his subject including mine also. It is important to motivate the professor and make them enthusiastic because it helps to fulfil their basic needs and make them fresh and their financial crisis would not hinder the quality of education of institute. Thus, the colleges should pay high amount of to ballooning the quality of education.
Furthermore, increasing the stipend of professor for bringing sanguine in education of students helps to attract the youngsters to choose their career as professor. For example, the study of University of Chicago depicts that 99% of young people are attention towards profession where there is high-paid salary and it would be great chance for young generation people to became as qualified professor in future so that many more high-skilled produced in up coming generations. It is crucial to devotion of youngsters to choose their career as lecturer because if they become best educator, then the quality of academic system would be blooming in the near future. Therefore, profuse salary of professor would enhance the standard of education.
To sum up, whether the boosting in the salary of the university professor accelerate the quality of education is complex. Some suggested that for enhancing the education, instead of increasing the stipend of instructor, it should be spend on physical facilities of universities. Nevertheless, I still contend that for betterment of education, universities should bourgeoning the salary of lecturer and that inspires professor to teach their pupils and mesmerize the young people to choose the career as professor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- Professor Today we re going to talk about the debate between economic growth and protecting the environment Economic growth creates new jobs and gives people money they can use to improve their lives On the other hand if we protect the environment it can
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support 73
- Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affect 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improved'?
Suggestion: improved
...ome rooms and computer center should be improve to proliferate the quality of academic ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
... universities for paying him low money. Nonetheless as the universities brings polices to m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ull marks in his subject including mine also. It is important to motivate the profes...
^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the best'.
Suggestion: become the best
...heir career as lecturer because if they become best educator, then the quality of academic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...the stipend of instructor, it should be spend on physical facilities of universities....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39260969977 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93751179854 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487297921478 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5755359494 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.666666667 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8666666667 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286770045024 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109358690105 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628379006915 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206484149596 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628722217602 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.