Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, people are really concerned about the quality of education, esprcially that of universities, and they come up with various ways to improve it. Personally, I believe that it is not so wise to invest money in the professor's salary. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following assay.

To begin with, it's more reasonable to spend limited, valuable money on the facilities of the college. To be more specific, buildings like labs and libraries are worthwhile to be updated, as they enable students feel cozier to do researches and explor knowledge. Besides, a beautiful campus with the larger area of vegetation can refresh students, indirectly benefit the education quality. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. During my schoollife, trials done in labs had a large portion in my academic work. I always felt fortunate that my university have plenty of advanced devices that I didn't have to share them with others or be worried about the lack of suitable tools.

Moreover, I think students are willing to embrace more chances of projects that can bring about personal development, whether they are academic or not. Since there are a great number of students, the application for projects is really competitve. With more investment, more students could be involved in and grab the chance to enhance personal abilities. For instance, every summer vacation, my brother's college has a project that elects superb students to get access to well-known companies and learn cutting-edge technologies. He is quite eager to participate in it but sadly he missed the chance. Hopefully, many students like him can improve themselves if more places are supplied.

In conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opnion that it would be more effective to futher improve the quality if sufficient money is invested in many other aspects, such as the school library or exchange programmes.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-02 rodriannnn 76 view
2022-12-11 subashdevkota 81 view
2022-10-20 pativ7 76 view
2022-08-24 Hello GRE 76 view
2022-06-05 Maryam Madson 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rodriannnn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...t is not so wise to invest money in the professors salary. I feel this way for two reasons...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... have plenty of advanced devices that I didnt have to share them with others or be wo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, really, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12539184953 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85812973339 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608150470219 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7434550488 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1875 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187878184902 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055578772731 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395039431742 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104675771689 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258880813628 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.