Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Undeniably, a number of factors come into play when it comes to the quality of education in universities, schools, or any other educational institutes. What is more, the practitioners and policy makers in the field of education have always been concerned with a way to improve the quality of education. Some people hold the opinion that if universities pay higher salaries to the professors, a high-quality education will be achieved. Contrary to what these people believe, I am of the opinion that spending more money on the salaries of professors does not guarantee a better education. The reasons, including but not limited to the following, can substantiate my viewpoint.
To begin with, there is no connection between the amount of money a professor receives and the quality of his or her education. To be more specific, there are a lot of well-paid teachers in various universities; however, students are not satisfied with the way they teach and in fact the quality of education is poor. There is no disguising the fact that if teachers and university professors are not passionate with what they are doing, no matter how much they earn, the quality of education will be unchanged. My brother is a good example of this explanation. Having been graduated in the field of chemistry, he always wanted to start up a new company and has his own business. Nevertheless, he was offered a teaching job position in one of the well-known universities and the amount of salary he was being offered was tempting. He had never wanted to be a teacher, therefore, the primary ingredient of being a teacher- passion- was missed. Under such a circumstance, he was always bored with his classes and he confessed that the quality of education in that university dropped dramatically because the only thing the university cared about was a pay raise.
The next reason in line is that in order to improve the quality of education, a university should be equipped with high-tech and state-of-the-art equipment besides recruiting fresh teachers. In other words, when the university invest a considerable amount of budget on improving facilities, like laboratories, libraries, sport clubs to name but a few, it would be more efficacious than to spend money on the salaries of the professors. In addition, by recruiting fresh and young professors who are concerned with the future of their students and those who are familiar with working with novel technology, a better educational environment will be provided. As an illustration, I studied in Tehran University and I read from the university website that the dean of the university announced a pay raise for the professors hoping to improve the quality of education. However, sooner than expected, not only did not see any improvement, but they also found out that being secured with higher salaries, professors were not as hard working as they were before. Therefore, after a year or two, they improved the physics laboratory and employed quite a few new professors. The change in the quality of education was remarkable; it was exactly at that year when some of the students won the physics medal in international competitions.
To recap, taking the above-mentioned reasons and examples into account, I believe that spending more money on the income of professors cannot lead to an educational improvement. The reasons are twofold: teachers need to be passionate about their career to make a change, moreover, spending money on other sections of the university can be more fruitful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 76
- playing a computer game is a waste of time. 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children shouldn t be allowed to play them 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1253, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...kable; it was exactly at that year when some of the students won the physics medal in inter...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in addition, in fact, in other words, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 15.1003584229 245% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2943.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 580.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07413793103 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07061704884 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463793103448 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 954.0 618.680645161 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1689540064 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.772727273 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316157803293 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966599183388 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063019866127 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214622396522 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352024387972 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.