The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The two diagrams illustrate the comparison of similarities, as well as differences, of an island before and after finishing the tourist facilities.
At first glance, there were various added facilities after the development of tourism; as a result, this place has been turned from uninhabited island to the residential and tourism one.
It is noticeable that there have been 15 accommodations which are constructed in the centre and the West of this island. Also, on the Northside of this place, a restaurant has been built behind a reception, which has been surrounded by the vehicle track. The footpath has been developed to create ways for households. Besides, this area has had palm trees dotted around in the whole period.
Turning to some broadened changes, although the beach on the West before completing the tourist facilities was not for human beings, after developing, people have been allowed to swim. In addition, a pier has been constructed to the Southside with several sailboats that have been added. Nevertheless, the area of this island is unchangeable throughout this period, at around 250 meters.
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 78
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 89
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23333333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93596262633 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7845739153 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213858598162 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855361424157 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965975456074 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153250127993 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984661218081 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.