In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

"In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.” Do you agree or disagree?

Automobile plays an important role in our society. Nowadays, we travel to most of the places by own vehicle. Although some people would say that there will be lesser vehicles in next twenty years, however I disagree with the referred statement. It is firm my belief that numbers of cars will be increased by many fold in future for several reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, developing nations are rapidly urbanizing which means that more people will require to travel to their workplaces. In the past, people were dependent on agriculture labor near their home. In contrast, today most of the population in main cities stay in apartment buildings far from their offices. Consequently, they need to cover longer distance every day. Here, I have to admit that my opinion has been profoundly influenced by own person experience. For example, my father works on farms in downtown. Normally, he walks on his foot to his workplace. On the hand, I am moved to the capital to work in a manufacturing plant and drive almost 35 km from my apartment to the factory every day. As a result, I have to have a vehicle to visit the office on weekdays. For this reason, cars are almost necessity in developing nations. Moreover, I cannot see any indication that this trend will halt in future.

Secondly, family incomes especially for youngsters are rising all over the world, which means that in the future automobiles will be more affordable. In the past, people were not used to attract high salaries so they could not spend automobile which were considered as privileged. On contrary, consumers in developing countries like India and China purchase millions of cars every day. Indeed, vehicles are become a symbol of affluence. Drawing from my own experience, I normally used to see the cars in the parking lot of my office. Last year, when I received a salary increment, I also bought a new vehicle. It’s certainly clear to see why buying capacity of individual positively influence the decision of buying new vehicle.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that in the near future, there will be more vehicle on the road than there are today on account of rapid world urbanization as well as rising incomes which will open up new market for automobile companies.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2024-08-25	pezhmanlamei	73	view
2023-12-13	jimHsu	76	view
2023-12-07	butterflyluo	80	view
2023-12-07	butterflyluo	66	view
2023-12-07	butterflyluo	66	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user batravision27 :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...ich means that more people will require to travel to their workplaces. In the past, peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 908, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ny indication that this trend will halt in future. Secondly, family incomes especiall...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89540816327 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71984120545 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0051776489 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4347826087 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0434782609 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.34782608696 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180308708132 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387173527065 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489099131196 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119599349807 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475059206142 0.0645574589148 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.