There is no doubt that developing nations need assistance from international agencies in order to advance further. Although some people believe that economical support is essential to address all their problems, others argue that technical help is far more important. In my opinion, both financial and technical advice is required to help the progressing countries.
There are many reasons why monetary help will benefit the developing nations. First of all, it will alleviate the sufferings of underprivileged people to some degree. This is because, many emergent countries are struggling with the problems related to lack of basic public infrastructure like roads, railways and public transportations. Therefore, they are in need of pecuniary support, which would help them to build roads, bridges and augment transport networks. Secondly, in majority of the third-world countries, impoverished and destitute people do not have access to basic necessities. For example, many African people are devoid of a balanced meal, primary education and clothing. As a result, financial aid would provide them with the means to mitigate those problems to a great extent.
Nevertheless, without practical aid and technical advice, providing only monetary help will be nothing but a futile attempt when it comes to helping the developing nations. In other words, majority of the poor nations neither have the financial support nor the knowledge for proper utilization of the resources. Thus, it has been observed that the money sanctioned by the world organizations for development is not used for the right purpose. Instead, a lion’s share of this donation fills the pocket of corrupted politician. For instance, in 2018, Japan agreed to help Columbia to build a bridge and contributed half a million dollars only to find out that majority of their contribution were misused by the unscrupulous Columbian officials. Hence, hand-on guidance about how to utilize the financial support is equally important.
In conclusion, international organizations should help developing countries to grow by providing financial support. However, in my opinion, it is crucial to provide some practical advice as well, because it will help them to maximize the use of the donated money.
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 93
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 97
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ther. Although some people believe that economical support is essential to address all the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... destitute people do not have access to basic necessities. For example, many African people are d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...international organizations should help developing countries to grow by providing financia...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50716332378 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02093526383 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573065902579 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6078174937 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2777777778 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285687343843 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783465537855 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586887570149 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177624173306 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046157272423 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.