Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is in this case Is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is in this case? Is a positive or negative development?

It is true that in today’s world, academic university degrees are considered to be more essential than personal past experiences or characteristics. The leading cause of this phenomenon is the mandatory requirements of specific skills and knowledge in some jobs and there are both positive and negative effects.

In modern society, formal academic training is the only easy reliable way to find an efficient, dependable employee. Firstly, the academic qualifiers show that they have more opportunities to earn career promotion as they have already accomplished how to gain better performance on common skills and educational credentials. Take a medical occupation as an example, a doctor must have distinctive qualifications, which affect that they are qualified to cure people. Secondly, following this trend can save some training time for employee recruiters. Compared to formal academic candidates who are likely ready to start working, the formal staff has to spend time tutoring non-academic applicants how to work properly.

While I agree that these qualifications are extremely important in many circumstances, I also believe that this situation might lead to a negative development in the recruitment process. The positive effect would include the ensure of the quality of the business, as a result, can secure and build the company’s reputation. However, many people who have various degrees still face difficulties dealing with their clients because of a lack of real-life experience. Moreover, the most concerning negative effect is that if disregarding one’s life knowledge and personal qualities, companies may hire the wrong mindset that is incompatible with the company’s culture or long-term development strategy.

In conclusion, although the undeniable benefits of having qualifications are the reason why it is considered the top priority in choosing an employee, I believe that it also leads to some detrimental consequences as well.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-11 trần ngọc tuấn 67 view
2023-11-27 ophongcute@gmail.com 84 view
2023-09-01 Afdalah Harris 73 view
2023-04-02 anhminhbnvn1 78 view
2022-10-09 linhdung01 50 view
Essays by user haphuongpham49 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ered to be more essential than personal past experiences or characteristics. The leading cause o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... have distinctive qualifications, which affect that they are qualified to cure people. Seco...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cess. The positive effect would include the ensure of the quality of the business, as a re...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67905405405 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22776253276 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7904292259 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.083333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283359797975 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846331540996 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389929166851 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141081635596 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453199422788 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ered to be more essential than personal past experiences or characteristics. The leading cause o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... have distinctive qualifications, which affect that they are qualified to cure people. Seco...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cess. The positive effect would include the ensure of the quality of the business, as a re...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67905405405 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22776253276 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7904292259 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.083333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283359797975 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846331540996 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389929166851 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141081635596 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453199422788 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.