The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The chart provides information, reported in 2008, about energy consumption in the United States from 1980 with the projections to 2030.
Overall, the consumption of petrol and oil increased over time, similar to that of coal and natural gas. Despite some fluctuations, the amount of Nuclear power and Solar/Wind slightly rose, while hydropower saw a small decline.
Fuel and Oil consumption fluctuated between 1980 and 1995 and increased year on year afterwards. It is projected to be approximately 14 quadrillion units by 2030. Coal stood at just over 15 quadrillion units in 1980 and began to rise gradually during the period to its projection at about 30 quadrillions in 2030. Natural Gas experienced a similar trend since 1980, with some fluctuations; however, it remained relatively unchanged after 2015.
Nuclear power and other alternative sources of energy accounted for only small units of the total, just under 5 quadrillions each. While the consumption of hydropower stayed at the same rate, that of solar power and nuclear energy grew slightly to about 5 and 7 quadrillion respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- In the modern world the image photograph or film is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- the chart and line graph
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females in Australia who were overweight from 1980 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33142857143 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04434705308 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594285714286 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.786305696 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259448448426 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113001369316 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127804206869 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188503558148 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166670853169 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.