Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
Modern discoveries have made our life easy and comfortable than ever. We live in the ages of science, which has produced some great innovations. These innovations had radically transformed our daily habits and have a close intimate relationship with us. However, some people argue that the way we live will have negative effects on future generations, while others disagree. If I were asked, I would definitely say that our method of life will have adverse effect on our future generations for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, we are in the age of industrialization. Numerous numbers of industries have been built to produce various appliances, which have made our life comfortable. These industries also have created employment. But, these industries are affecting the environment adversely. As a result, global temperature has risen than ever, which resulted in the increase of sea level. I have to admit that my opinion on this issue has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. For example, Bangladesh, my home country is a land of rivers. Almost one-third of its population lives near the coastal area. Due to global warming, already many people have lost their houses and forced to settle to another place. These people went to below the poverty line as they lost their assets and now living in a miserable condition. If the sea level had not risen, then these people would have their own houses and lands to live a peaceful life.
Secondly, we, the current generation are consuming a large quantity of fuels. And if we continue to use the fuel at this rate, then the stock of this precise resource will finish in someday, which will create havoc in the world. To be ore specific, every day we are pumping out an enormous amount of fuel for using at industries, riding cars, and buses. For example, my home country is totally dependent on other countries for it’s fuel and every year the country has to pay a huge amount of money for paying the import bills of fuels. As a result, the government is increasing the tax rate every year and the cost of living is increasing day by day. Therefore, it is certainly clear that our style of life has a negative effect on our off spring’s life.
In the light of above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that the lifestyle of our generation has an adverse effect on children’s life. Therefore, the policymakers should formulate the policies so that we can leave a livable world for our next generation.
- The city council of Town x has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in the public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs 63
- The consumption of three spread between 1981 and 2007 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 85
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: FOR_ITS_NN[24]
Message: Did you mean 'for its fuel'?
Suggestion: for its fuel
...is totally dependent on other countries for it’s fuel and every year the country has to pay a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: ABOUT_ITS_NN[25]
Message: Did you mean 'for its fuel'?
Suggestion: for its fuel
...is totally dependent on other countries for it’s fuel and every year the country has to pay a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... livable world for our next generation.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, while, as to, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78659095729 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7951349015 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22085447898 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605994504681 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693801964274 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140965583091 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832578713654 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.