The graph is a representation of the recycling rate of four different materials like paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics, during the period 1982 to 2010 for a particular country.
The recycling rate for the most recycled item paper and cardboard has been between the range of 60% to 70% from 1982 - 2010 with some fluctuations. Initially, the percentage grew by 5% between 1982 - 1986, after which it again depleted by 5% in the period 1986 - 1990. Then it gradually increased and reached a peak with an 80% recycling rate in mid of 1990 - 1994, which later kept on descending until 2010 and reached 70% by then.
Initially, starting in 1982 at 50% recycling rate the glass containers saw a downfall to 40% until reaching 1990's, after which it took a steady increase and reached up to 60% by the year 2010. The Aluminium cans took the start only after 1982 at a slow pace, but it has taken a steep rise over the years and reached to more than 40% recycling rate by the year 2010.
Plastics have seen the lowest of the recycling trend, with its rate ranging between just 0-10% over the years. The recycling of plastics started only after 1986, but it is yet to pick up as compared to other materials in that particular country.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones in our daily lives 73
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems Is it a Positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience 84
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 84
- Tourism is an ever growing industry What benefits do you think tourism brings to individuals and society 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66816143498 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54345684038 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.5845055203 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163157866159 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823117120446 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058669607076 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116767642778 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563824280568 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.