The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in a European nation in the year 2002 except for the last three months.
Overall, a more detailed look at the picture reveals that there was an increasing number of expediture on three mobile, namely Domo, Lex, and Alpha, and vice versa for Sim TX, although all of them underwent several fluctuations. In addition, Alpha witnessed a surge to become the most prevalent item.
In January, the contract of Domo had the greatest figure, at 15 euros, which was threefold as much as Alpha.
After six months, the former increased to 20 euros, prior to being on certain variations while the latter turned back the first point and the lowest one as well. In the end of period, Domo went down minimally by just under 25 euros, ranking as the second position, whereas Alpha went up five times as much as its in Junuary, at exactly 25 euros.
Likewise, Lex comprised more than 10 euros. In Feburuary, it hitted the lowest point, at 10 euros, followed by moderate rise with the exception of the figure in June. By contrast, Sim Tx had an opposite trend. At first six months, this figure grew gradually to reach a peak at nearly 15 euros. After that, it reduced by just under the first point.
Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in a European nation in the year 2002 except for the last three months.
Overall, a more detailed look at the picture reveals that there was an increasing number of expenditure on three mobile, namely Domo, Lex, and Alpha, and vice versa for Sim TX, although all of them underwent several fluctuations. In addition, Alpha witnessed a surge to become the most prevalent item.
In January, the contract of Domo had the greatest figure, at 15 euros, which was three fold as much as Alpha.
After six months, the former increased to 20 euros, prior to being on certain variations while the latter turned back the first point and the lowest one as well. In the end of period, Domo went down minimally by just under 25 euros, ranking as the second position, whereas Alpha went up five times as much as its in January, at exactly 25 euros.
Likewise, Lex comprised more than 10 euros. In February, it hit the lowest point, at 10 euros, followed by moderate rise with the exception of the figure in June. By contrast, Sim Tx had an opposite trend. At first six months, this figure grew gradually to reach a peak at nearly 15 euros. After that, it reduced by just under the first point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-01 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | KEVA | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 92
- The graph below gives information from 1 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The global demand for oil and gas is increasing Some believe that we should therefore encourage the exploitation of remote areas Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 98
- The development of science and technology benefit our life However scientists cannot find effective solutions for what they created Do you agree or disagree 65
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 310, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...eas Alpha went up five times as much as its in January, at exactly 25 euros. Lik...
^^^
Line 8, column 122, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... at 10 euros, followed by moderate rise with the exception of the figure in June. By contrast, Sim Tx...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, look, second, well, whereas, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64601769912 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3642069513 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4204795372 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114742291672 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050021311965 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147291268158 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10964086004 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202980207595 0.0819641961636 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.