The decline of frogs populations
Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to the decline of many frog species or even so their extinction. More specifically, in regards to the passages, the writer puts forth the idea that with the help of three methods, this could potentially change for the benefit of frogs ecosystems. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws in the writer's claims. In fact, the professor believes that none of the methods presented can slow down or decline the consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each possible solution propossed in the reading text.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states that pesticides are heavily harming frogs populations, because of its strong effect on a frog's body. So in order to prevent frogs from being harmed, he proposes to use laws that prohibit farmers from using harmful pesticides near frog populations. Another professional in the same field, stand in firm opposition to this claim. In the listening, for example, the professor states that reducing pesticides is neither practical, nor fair. She goes on to say that, in fact, by doing this, the farmers are going to be negatively affected because they will be in severe disadvantages from other competitive farmers that do not have to follow such strong regulations.
One group of scholars, represented by the writer, think that a type of fungus that has been spread through the world has got deadly effects, but some researchers have discovered also some treatments to treat or prevent these diseases. Of course, though, not all experts in this field believe this is accurate. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when she states that in order for those treatments to work on frogs species, they have to be applied individually, so it is not going to be practical when you think in a big scale. Furthermore, it is complicated and expensive because it has to be applied in new generations as well.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that frogs habitats have been threatened, especially by human activities that include excessive use of water, so these habitats must be better protected so then frog species will be able to recover. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that although she finds this as a good idea, the real threat is global warming and not especially human activity.
To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about the decline of the frog population. It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
- Pterosaurs 3
- The decline of frogs populations 80
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- history 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...so their extinction. More specifically, in regards to the passages, the writer puts forth the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, then, well, as to, even so, for example, in fact, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 30.3222958057 218% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1373.03311258 161% => OK
No of words: 442.0 270.72406181 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98868778281 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.722456579 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 145.348785872 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545248868778 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 419.366225166 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2986445059 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.705882353 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191754953199 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064301082464 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781824267265 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1167397845 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594803521141 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.