Technology has brought revolution in human being's life which no one could ever imagined or predicted, speaking of which does not nullify the impact of art that has contributed in marvelous development of the society. Arts and science both have been most integral elements of human lives. It is disagreed that scientist affect our life more than artists such as painters, writers and musicians. Analyzing both positive effects of music on person's mind and stories as well as paintings which plays a crucial role in strengthening individual's skills will prove this.
Firstly, needless to say about the magic of music that humans have witnessed since the bronze age; in fact music has evolved with ages, and not only people have always adored it but it's soothing effect has also played a vital role when science could not work after certain limits. For instance, as per research done by University of Cambridge, seventy percent dementia patients recovered significantly when group singing was introduced to them as a refreshment activity; which later was made mandatory as a part of the treatment. Unfortunately, this advantageous side of music was under the shadow of science until this research was published. Thus, it is obvious that role of musicians who create music has worked as a catalyst in breaking the stereotypical science and technology oriented mindset of the society.
Secondly, pictures and stories have never missed a chance to amuse infants; it cultivates imagination pattern from the younger age which ultimately builds up skills such as writing, painting, etc. For example, brainstorming of children starts when they see paintings or read stories; it does not only shape their thinking pattern but also enhances their reading and writing skills, which in turn creates novel writers and painters who motivates the world with their art. Such is a process where scientist or technology cannot take a charge to lead. From this it becomes quite evident that role of scientist is a bit inferior in comparison with painters and writers.
In summary, it can be said that just science cannot inspire people to break the boundaries and think out of the box; arts offers benefits on a greater scale. Hence, notion of scientist's supreme role over artists cannot be supported. After analyzing this subject, it is predicted that outcome related to arts in over-all development and success of humanity will forever be stronger than the science.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Today children are spending much more time watching TV compared to the past Why do you think this happens Is this a positive or a negative change 90
- Some people believe that wild birds or animals should be forced out of the city while others think they should be kept in the city Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Many people believe that criminals should be imprisoned others however say they should do unpaid work that is beneficial for the community Discuss both view and your opinion 78
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...hnology has brought revolution in human beings life which no one could ever imagined o...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...yzing both positive effects of music on persons mind and stories as well as paintings w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, speaking of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17085427136 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69007136098 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8522578024 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.2 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114907017269 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480745656022 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855291697759 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693228835975 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348469007684 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.