A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly.Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world. Do you think that benefits of tourism outweigh its drawbacks?
Traveling is a trend that is persistent in the device system in the country considering the merits of such type of activity which in fact indubitably overshadow the downsides.
Traveling is a possessed by a gamut of merits and benefit and primordial of which is sustainable finance. Not only providing directly job opportunities for local residents, holiday business also subsidises some activities through profiting from the revenue of tourism. On account of the requirement of habitations, foodstuffs and handicraft souvenirs, local dwellers acquire massive return which will help to develop the tourism site. Moreover, the income coming from this device plays an important role in national economy.
The fact that the awareness of residents enhances undoubtedly is really another indisputable reality that forties the foregoing. People ordinarily underestimate the resources around them as soon as the outsiders admire and overvalue on them. As a result, it constitutes the proud of local residents thus they preserve and concern about the environment elaborately.
While the litany of plus factors are imposingly persuasive, the fact that minor hassles are likewise inevitable and classic proof of this is the modification of culture. The reversal caused by tourists is perhaps positive and negative, however, society cannot decide the desirable way in reality. Some people want to maintain all traditions, others perceive the potential of the varied market. Otherwise, the local residents may interfere the traditional customs themselves on account of modernized reflection or simply aspiring more money.
All things considered, supremacies of tourism certainly outride its handicap. However, everyone should be mindful of preserving the environment and intangible cultural heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | bigbuu97 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Nguyễn Ánh Hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Nguyễn Ánh Hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | Kiwi | 89 | view |
- Gender gap in technology What problems will this cause Suggest some measures that could be taken to resolve the problem 70
- Some people believe that university education should only be offered for those who can pay for the own courses and the government should not be expected to fund higher education To what extent do you agree 73
- A good number of people say that children of families who reach the age of 18 should be required to leave the family and live independtly henceforth To what extand do you agree or disagree with reasons and examples 84
- Some people believe that university education should only be offered for those who can pay for the own courses and the government should not be expected to fund higher education To what extent do you agree 78
- What is gender gap in technology what are effects and how to resolve the problem 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding resources'?
Suggestion: the surrounding resources
...egoing. People ordinarily underestimate the resources around them as soon as the outsiders admire and ove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, really, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77358490566 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04650089042 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0753692082 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.077047414969 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0224939474375 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321494473052 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374253890067 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414747253003 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.