A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world. Do you think that the benefits of tourism outweigh its drawbacks?
In the modern world, tourism has become a key financial contributor to the development of many nations. This may bring several beneficial impacts on the economy growth or job creation for those, but I am personally of the opinion that they do not really overshadow the disadvantages if it is not efficiently controlled.
Firstly, the main reason why tourism would positively affect the host countries in such situations is its economic boost. This industry is a wide-ranging business including loads of service fees for visitors such transportation, accommodation or cuisine. The government can profit from them to facilitate other development in terms of education, healthcare or infrastructure. Besides, more job opportunities are available as the results of the country’s business-developing concentrations. Not only is more working demand opened for residents but also the options are increased when the investment from many organizations is poured into, especially in the rural areas. Therefore, the average living standard is improved as proof of tourism’s role when countries take it as a main source of income.
However, environmental effects are worth-concerned in case of inappropriate industry management which make the drawbacks cannot be overwhelmed by its advantages. On the tourist level, littering is inevitable unless there are suitable management policies and closely supervised by the host nations. Air and water pollution would surely be a big problem for the whole planet in the long term. Additionally, over-exploitation and over-construction also cause a detrimental effect on the ecosystem from the host party perspective. For example, too many facilities are built to serve the touristy areas which is synonymous with the restriction of wildlife habitats and the loss of ecosystems diversity will take place sooner or later.
In conclusion, taking tourism as the major source of income in lots of places could be advantageous for the economy as well as the citizens’ lives but they are not superior to the downsides while the environment should be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | bigbuu97 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Nguyễn Ánh Hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Nguyễn Ánh Hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | Kiwi | 89 | view |
- Some people think c and therefore they consider it a waste of time to read news in newspapers or watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 80
- It was predicted that with the development of technology people in the 21st century would have much more free time than past To what extent has this prediction come true 52
- The chart below shows the proportions of graduates from Brighton University in 2019 entering different employment sectors Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54828660436 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44256071405 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0235599615 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.214285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246799109551 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693973891548 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767260233643 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147369715196 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720599648399 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54828660436 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44256071405 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0235599615 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.214285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246799109551 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693973891548 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767260233643 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147369715196 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720599648399 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.