The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
The pie charts depict how the percentage of 5 different kinds of manufactured energy in France changed from 1995 to 2005, namely: Coal, Gas, Petro, Inuclear and Other. Overall, Gas, Coal and Petro were always the major parts of the industry. In addition, all energy production rates witnessed an increase over the period whilst that of Petro went through an opposite trend.
In 1995, the proportion of Coal, Gas and Petro produced accounted for almost 90% of manufacturing activity and had an extremely similar number to each other, with 29.8%,29.63% and 29.27% respectively. The remaining roughly 10% went to Inuclear and unspecified energy production.
10 years later, the trend was only retained for Coal and Gas with a slight increase of about 1% each. While the other energy and Inuclear rates also experienced a slight rise to 10.1% and 9.1% respectively, the figure for Petro had a downward trend when it decreased by almost a half to 19.55%.
- Some people think c and therefore they consider it a waste of time to read news in newspapers or watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that news has no connection to people s lives and therefore they consider it a waste of time to read news in newspapers or watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 80
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 80
- Nowadays people have expectations to get things instantly news products services and don t want to wait Why Positive or negative development 84
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 159 200
No. of Characters: 760 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.551 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.78 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.601 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 50 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.31 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.462 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.462 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4