Nowadays people have expectations to get things instantly (news, products, services) and don’t want to wait. Why? Positive or negative development?
Currently, there is a trend of people’s craving for immediate solutions to all of their concerns without delay, such as matters related to news, products or services. This phenomenon is contributed by various factors which mainly involve the technological impact on our daily lives and our modern lifestyle. Additionally, I personally take it as a detrimental way of living, specifically to our mentality.
Firstly, technological advancement is a key contributor worth noting as it fosters a culture of instant gratification. Due to the advent of smartphones, high-speed Internet and enormous amounts of data available, they have facilitated how we approach the outside world. We are able to access information, order food or use any services within a few taps. To be more specific, most of Vietnamese people, whenever they receive a quite long English text for their work or study, they will copy and paste the whole text into a convenient and advanced translating tool like Google Translate as a habit rather than spending time looking up and learning the new words for their future use. Besides, we are living more hectically than we did in the past because of the rise in basic living expenses such as rental or tuition fees as well as people’s self-targets. From there, we tend to spend more time focusing on our work which is synonymous with the limited waiting time for others. Therefore, the instant gratification mindset has been forming gradually and has become the norm in present society.
In terms of its impact, this lifestyle is wholly negative since it is costly and potentially deleterious to people’s minds. As mentioned earlier, for instant gratification, we surely must pay more than usual. Let us take a man doing a check-up at a hospital as an example. If he always desires immediate solutions regarding his problems, he will want to quickly proceed with the procedures. He has to use the advanced diagnostics service which is certainly more expensive than the basic one and that potentially uses up all of the money he has been working hard to earn. Eventually, he finds himself caught in a cycle. Moreover, the long-lasting effects on our health and mentality are the latent risks associated with this mindset. Contributing to the habit of Vietnamese mentioned above, this can be convenient and immediately solve their problems at that time but they will excessively rely on the technology. As a result, they are likely to be unable to be proficient in English as well as engage in a conversation or write an email without it.
In conclusion, the having-anything-instantly-done expectations are gradually created by people’s restricted time availability and their reliance on technology. From my personal perspective, such mindset is completely detrimental, especially to their minds.
- Nowadays people have expectations to get things instantly news products services and don t want to wait Why Positive or negative development 84
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 73
- Nowadays people have expectations to get things instantly news products services and don t want to wait Why Positive or negative development 84
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... basic one and that potentially uses up all of the money he has been working hard to earn....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2373.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 455.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21538461538 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2811457084 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575824175824 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5163271816 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997896560911 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286177819442 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362381012094 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659558670431 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021247972465 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.