In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays an ever-increasing number of women work fulltime, and in this reality it is widely believed that household chores should be shared between men and women equally. For that, I strongly agree with this statement.
One of the reason for sharing housework between is to promote gender equality. A stereotype that has existed for a long time that female ought to stay home, taking care of their family once they got married while men taking care of family financial. This includes looking after the children and doing all the housework, which is fairly labored intensive. However, this approach could have quite a few disadvantages. It would render women less able of keeping abreast of what happening in the job market, thus forming a lifestyle where they might find it arduous to step into the society again. To avoid this, married women are willing to get back into the workforce soon after their maternity leave, and once they do, it makes sense that their husband should share part the house chores, to fulfill their family responsibilities. Nevertheless, we cannot be oblivious several drawbacks of this trend.
One potential downside is that men are fewer experiences in dealing with household tasks. This is because many seldom take an active role in doing housework; according to customs of many countries. As a result, they may end up doing household tasks in a less than perfect way, which could contribute to some unnecessary quarrels between partners, hindering their family bond. However, the likelihood of this happening is not very high, because wives can offer some tips or guidance to their husband when they learn how to shares house chores such as mopping floors or doing the laundry.
In short, although some conflicts might be triggered when equally sharing the duties of household tasks, the benefit of this trend are relatively obvious.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-07 | Tamanna Champaneri | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | Sprios_D | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | Sprios_D | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | nigora@ | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | leminhthong098 | 89 | view |
- In many large cities people waste hours of their time every day because of traffic congestion on the roads What are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 86
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 78
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 84
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some systems require students to speacialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of two education systems and what is better 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08143322476 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6015681216 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612377850163 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7351889303 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214960133917 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689134512659 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602031929846 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137949795637 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799815557905 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.