In the future, nobody will buy printed books or newspapers because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this day and age, we are living in the modern world with the proliferation of social media si it is said that the Internet and other kinds of the-state-of-the-art devices such as TV, laptops and more will become the dominant factors in the future when no books are needed any more. While I agree that the Internet will mostly bring people access to information, I believe that the conventional ways of reading are indispensable.
On the one hand, I believe that reading online will become prime way to gain knowledge. That is because the Internet provides us an easier access to sources of information about all aspects in life. Just by staying at home and typing words, we can find relevant information at a push of the button, which is extremely time and money-saving. Moreover, this way of reading is quite eco-friendly due to the fact that forests don’t have to be cut down for the production of paper. More specifically, when materials reading posted on numerous websites can easily and freely shared with other people via Twitter or Facebook.
On the other hand, I lean towards the opinion that books and other printed materials cannot be superseded completely. Firstly, books and newspapers are regarded as a reliable source of information. In fact, before publishing a book or a magazine, all of its contents have to be written by professional and well-qualified authors as well as have to be censored thoroughly to minimize the mistakes while a range of articles on the Internet can be written by people at all age and even having no qualifications so that it is understandable that a large number of people, especially the old don’t rely on this source of knowledge too much. Secondly, many people have a preference for holding and reading printed materials, which is more beneficial for the eyesight and mental health than sticking to computers and smart phones’ screen. Finally, the process of possessing knowledge while reading books helps us remember much longer than reading online because we have to endeavor more to read and classify information, which is more challenging than reading on the Internet. Therefore, the new-found knowledge will remain in our memory for a long time, which really does wonders for our studying.
In short, in spite of the scenario for the prevalence of cutting-edge technology, printed books will always play a vital part in our daily life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in 2 cities in May 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- These days a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather on sports Why Is it a positive or negative development 85
- Internet users as percentage of population
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tions so that it is understandable that a large number of people, especially the old don’t rely o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, in short, such as, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97512437811 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93426914199 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.031826793 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.857142857 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188283185158 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677450018703 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343186540766 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118285386053 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019993659175 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.