The diagram below shows the plans for designing a trade show floor from 2009 to 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the plans for designing a trade show floor from 2009 to 2010. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two given designs illustrate the significant alterations of a trade show floor in the 2009-2010 period.

It is obvious that the main and side entrances remained intact over this span. Moreover, in spite of the balcony’s consistent location, it was added with a lounge area.

Noticeably, there was an exchange in the location of some places. Having situated between the main entrance and the side one in 2009, the refreshment room was relocated to the right side, next to the balcony, which used to be the area of registration booth, a year later. In addition, this reordering also happened to the conference hall and exhibition area. In 2009, the conference hall was located in the left side, then moved to the right, experiencing a decline in its size. However, the exhibition area was expanded three times in one year.

Another striking point to note is the disappearance of the meeting room. In 2009, it was situated next to the conference hall before being destructed in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (21 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-07-26 sannacoconutandmango 78 view
Essays by user sannacoconutandmango :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de show floor in the 2009-2010 period. It is obvious that the main and side ent...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion, it was added with a lounge area. Noticeably, there was an exchange in the...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was expanded three times in one year. Another striking point to note is the di...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97604790419 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78367770374 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3934004625 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10627403042 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443278312257 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775993366882 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937876781386 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100295851977 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.