The best way to ensure the growth of children is to make parents take parenting courses. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that parents should take part in nurture classes to have accordant methods which help to make sure children's development. In my perspective, I concur with this view and will outline the reasons below.
To begin with, most parents feel disturbed when raising their children. From caring for babies to them to attending school and how to achieve good academic results. Courses will assist parents to learn what to expect at each child's developing stage as well as prepare for the next step. When parents are confident and have certain insights, they will also raise young people with these qualities. Parent classes bring the most essential tools and skills which support the parenting proceed and reduce parent's anxiety. Learning to master basic theories about children is really worth the time to spend.
Secondly, in the hustle and bustle society like today, father, mother or often both do not have enough time to take care of their kids as well as self-study parental skills. Agree that they can rely on grandparents, however, parent's affection and care for their children's growth is extremely important. Therefore, when visiting a parent workshop, such as Workshop "Discovering Potential in Children- Who is your child" at MTCV, people will be approached to the latest science and technology in rearing children around the world. They will have the opportunity to learn practical skills from leading experts and these aspects need to be improved right after the course. For example, many studies have shown that parents' compliments to their children for the first time a child finishes a job well, in the long run, can cause children to lose joy and interest in work. Because then the goal of the child is the compliment or reward rather than the process of completing work.
In conclusion, with the analyse aforementioned above, I believe that parenting courses could provide some beneficial outcomes for both parents and children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | chichinn | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | littledng | 61 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree of disagree 56
- The chart below shows the average cost of the monthly contract for four di erent mobiles cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 84
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 73
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 84
- The chart below give information about the highspeed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... enough time to take care of their kids as well as self-study parental skills. Agree that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...completing work. In conclusion, with the analyse aforementioned above, I believe that pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60046038952 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0996850581 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293461278478 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987868004312 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762613735834 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187918991919 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255417046621 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... enough time to take care of their kids as well as self-study parental skills. Agree that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...completing work. In conclusion, with the analyse aforementioned above, I believe that pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60046038952 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0996850581 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293461278478 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987868004312 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762613735834 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187918991919 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255417046621 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.