Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Visiting other nations has become popular recently. There’s a debate about whether local customs and behavior should be followed or the host country needs to accept cultural uniqueness. This essay will discuss both sides of the issue and offer my view.
There are several reasons supporters might suggest. Traveling for pleasure is often the main purpose for the majority of visitors. Due to their desire to escape from daily lives with endless commitments and be immersed in a new and exciting culture, travelers tend to be more open and receptive. Secondly, local customs and behavior are unspoken rules to ensure any society’s stability. Without complying with these, unnecessary trouble might come to these newcomers. For instance, visitors to the USA may be considered rude if they ask for a woman’s age or someone’s salary which makes sense because these are private matters Americans rarely share with strangers. In brief, the travelers’ respect for the local culture can result from their prior interest in exploring the new place. More importantly, it can help them to get along with people during the trip.
However, other arguments are seen by opponents. First of all, it’s easier said than done. Visitors need to follow the present culture’s values but in reality, even the locals are not fully aware of all the social cues themselves. Furthermore, problems travelers can get into because of misunderstandings could be prevented. One of the effective ways might be doing better research on the destination’s culture and getting advice from people who have been there before. Another reason to promote cultural differences is the benefits foreigners can bring. It could be their knowledge, skills, or experience. This can be seen in a great many scientific conferences and expert inviting trips that have occurred globally. In such cases, local people will listen and be willing to accommodate the visitors’ needs which usually include resting and eating habits. Besides, countries like Vietnam where tourism plays an essential role might benefit by showing friendliness and tolerance. This can lead to bigger economic gains in the long run. To sum up, respecting cultural differences brings more good than harm to the host country.
In conclusion, both views have their reasons. In a particular situation like Vietnam, it will be in our best interest to maintain a balance. We only interfere if serious harm to our values is going to be done by an outsider and for the rest, we should show empathy and understanding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | ngthanh1220@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | niloya | 73 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 84
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in brief, in conclusion, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7712769989 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631707317073 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5476485567 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3076923077 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7692307692 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20405542384 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511407835986 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457793413131 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135905189339 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642802733784 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.