Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
The Internet in today's world is not only a medium for amusement but also a necessity. I genuinely believe access to the Internet, and free information should be considered as a human right. The Internet facilitates the propagation of information and news, which will inform society about the surrounding events. Moreover, it will help many to do their daily tasks efficiently. These daily activities constitute a broad range of financial transactions to smart homes management.
To begin with, in modern-day society, access to uncensored news is considered invaluable. The more informed community is, the wiser decisions it will take. I think governments, which are not autocratic, should provide free access to the Internet for their citizens. For example, in Iran, access to the Internet, for most websites and services, is blocked. Consequently, many people use untrusted sources of information in order to obtain fresh news. This led to some chaos that unstabilized Iran's economic and political systems.
Furthermore, the Internet can be conducive to how people can carry out their daily actives. For example, they can use the Network to purchase goods or take an online course from their universities. I can recall an experience that is a compelling example of this. During Iran's Internet blackout, which happened around a year ago while there was an ongoing protest, many services were shutdown. As a result, many businesses suffered from the consequences. The impact was that sever that those businesses couldn't financially survive even after the blackout. Additionally, many people were not able to do their primary tasks. For instance, at that time, I wanted to registry the TOEFL iBT test, but due to the blackout, I was not able to transfer the money oversea. Consequently, it has ruined my plan for applying to a US university.
To conclude, I am of the opinion that the Intenet should be free and considered as a fundamental human right. Access to the open Internet should even have mentioned in the constitution. I think the Internet will provide a source for news and information dissemination, a necessity in modern life. Besides that, it will soothe the way we live and form our society in a better way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 43
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world 73
- Edmontosaurus migration 71
- golden frog 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ct was that sever that those businesses couldnt financially survive even after the blac...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12672176309 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98462187411 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556473829201 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.3676481834 48.9658058833 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5416666667 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.125 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187066808173 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540336186347 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611450693653 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124565192945 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310522037147 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.