The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given demonstration compares different details of a city hospital in two specific periods, 2007 and 2010. Overall, significant alterations are indicated in this illustration.
In 2007, there were only intersections of City Road and Hospital Road, and Hospital Road and Ring Road. Compared to 2019, these were replaced with roundabouts, enabled vehicles to move smoother.
On the east of Hospital Road in 2007 was the car park for staff and public combined with several bus stops lied on both sides of this road. However, in 2010, bus stops were removed and bus stations were constructed on the west of Hospital Road The car park was currently available for staff only. Patients or people would park their cars in the public car park built on the east of the hospital.
In conclusion, the city hospital was equipped with modern infrastructure after three years. The area used for the hospital was the only place that had not changed though.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04430379747 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67748450032 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5125174257 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184701005882 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813531325572 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833914529042 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122775370416 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449976637963 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.