Task 2: Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. Wha are the reasons and what can be done to encourage them to spend their time walking?
Walking is scientifically proven to be beneficial for people's health. However, in this hustle and bustle society, there is a decline in the number of walkers on a daily basis. In my perspectives, this problem is caused by several reasons and we could come up with some solutions to encourage them to spend more time walking.
There are a number of reasons which affect the habit of walking of the citizens. First of all, the development of transport systems around where people live provides a more comfortable way of travelling. It might take them less time on the roads, except in the traffic jams to reach the destination. Second, since the governments care less about the construction for walkers, they don't have any specific paths such as sidewalks or walk paths for walking activities. People believe that the facilities are not fully invested to keep them safe from other transportation such as cars or bicycles.
With reasons listed in the previous paragraph, the encouragement for individual walking is extremely necessary. At first, the government should redesign or add more facilities suitable for people to walk more comfortable. For example, building more private lanes with sitting benches and growing more trees in order to provide places for walkers to take a rest or feel less exhausted when walking are highly recommended. Secondly, they can restrict the number of private cars on the roads by laws or obligations, or just encourage people walking more by giving them several small awards like having more day-off. Last but not least, the citizens should recognize the significant important role of walking on daily basic to their health and increase their awareness to have a healthier lifestyle in this busy world.
In conclusion, people should walk more in order to keep fit Thus, both the governments and individuals have to play an important role in encouraging the residents to walk more on daily.
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 84
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education Agree or disagree 72
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 2 Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis Wha are the reasons and what can be done to encourage them to spend their time walking 67
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourage them to spend more time walking. There are a number of reasons which affe...
^^^
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Second, since the governments care less about the construction for walkers, they...
^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bout the construction for walkers, they dont have any specific paths such as sidewal...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08201892744 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80095630243 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4547031343 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267529244601 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100320174507 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465292221439 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174653744763 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263393582589 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourage them to spend more time walking. There are a number of reasons which affe...
^^^
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Second, since the governments care less about the construction for walkers, they...
^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bout the construction for walkers, they dont have any specific paths such as sidewal...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08201892744 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80095630243 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4547031343 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267529244601 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100320174507 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465292221439 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174653744763 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263393582589 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.