The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates four sectors in terms of producing acid rain in UK from 1990 to 2007.
Overall, it is evident that the number of acid rain emissions witnessed a significant downward trend for the most of the period. It is also notable that the figure for producing acid rain of electricity, gas and water supply had the fastest drop in comparison with the other three categories.
In 1990, there were about 3.3 million tons in the number of acid rain discharged by electricity, gas and water supply while the figure for transport and communication stood at only 0.75 million tons, which was over three times less than the former. Over the next 17 years, a dramatic drop was experienced in the number of acid rain emissions before hitting the lowest point of 0.5 at the end of the time surveyed. Meanwhile, the quantity of acid rain emissions saw a slight fluctuation before peaking at 1 million, which was followed by a moderate decrease by over 0.5 in 2007.
Starting at over 0.5 million tons in 1990, the figure for domestic remained stable for the next 4 years but later plummeted enormously to about 0.25 in 2007. Likewise, nearly 2 million tons of acid rain came from other industries in 1990, which was followed by a drop of about 1 million tons in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-08 | czefw13 | view | |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | Mary L. | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | thanhnguyenqc1985@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 82
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 2011 to 2013 67
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes 69
- he following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes 92
- Qualities which a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learnt at university or similar academic institutions Do you agree or disagree with this idea 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55067746992 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497777777778 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5984528646 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302858788067 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161065379286 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115249735826 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229578789542 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125006789723 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.