The provided pie chart outlines the main factors for farmland degradation on over the world whilst the table illustrates the effect of land losing its productivity in the three parts of the world in the 1990s.
In general, the predominant for land degradation around the globe is due to over-grazing. Markedly, Europe’s land seemed to be the most desolate by four elements significantly.
As is presented in the pie chart, 65% of degradation is brought about by over-grazing and deforestation, constituting 35% and 30% respectively. In contrast, the proposition of over-cultivation which damaged agricultural land was approximately 28%. The non-specific factor which is categorized as “other” taken up at 7%.
Based on the table, Europe had a remarkable percentage of total barren land that was considered as the highest number among the three regions with 23%. The leading agent that deteriorate the land most was logging by 9.8%, moreover 9 times than in North America and Oceania (a large group of islands in the South Pacific including Australia and New Zealand). Even though Oceania had 0% of over-cultivation, it still faced land degradation because of two main reasons, over-grazing (11.3%) and deforestation (1.7%). Regarding North America, over-cultivation is held as the extensive cause in erode the land but still obtained a relatively small proposition, just only 3,3%.
In a nutshell, it is clear that Europe suffered more from farmland degradation than the other regions and mainly caused by deforestation and over-cultivation.
- Violence in playgrounds is increasing However it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies Discuss this view and give your own opinion Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge or 78
- Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, in contrast, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42323651452 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42487826845 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614107883817 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1463011831 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177142992007 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658983487831 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642625978887 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10826812413 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750873941967 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.