The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960, 2010
The pie chart compares the proportion of workers in three different categories in town A and town B from 1960 to 2010.
Overall, it is evident that while the number of people working in manufacturing witnessed a significant increase, the opposite was true for the other two categories in both towns. It is notable that the highest quantity of workers in town A was in manufacturing whereas in town B that was in sales.
In 1960, there were about 29% people in town A working in manufacturing in comparison with only 8% in town B. Over 50 years of the period, these figures experienced a dramatic upward trend to 64% for the former and 24% for the latter.
Sales become the most common job in both town A and town B, accounting for 41% and 72% respectively. In the meantime, there were only 30% people working in services in town A and this figure was slightly smaller, standing at about 20% in town B. The year 2010 saw a substantial decrease of 21% and 18% in the number of people working as salesperson. Likewise, starting at 30% in 1960, the figure for people working in services in town A declined moderately to 16% while that for town B climbed of 21% at the end of the time survey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | letrang25011991 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | kieutrangkg1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | view |
- Internet users as percentage of population
- The table gives information about the temperatures and hours of daylight during the same weekend in two cities in May 2007
- the diagram below shows the production of olive oil 61
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses, so people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same style as the old houses in the local area. Do the advantages outweigh the 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46330275229 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71218869387 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0363756538 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400207806869 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187412688207 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113689750357 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264809855293 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924230138457 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.