“The information revolution by modern mass media has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society.” To what extent do you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the information revolution by modern mass media has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the traditional media might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that modern mass media can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the information revolution by modern mass media can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that promoting the awareness of the society and online mass media are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the role of social networks in human life. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the information technology and news broadcasting distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, modern mass media might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of people's relationships. Moreover, fundamental aspects of mass media can relate to the reality that the demerits of the virtual world can pertain to the lack of self-esteem. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the information revolution were correlated positively with moral values, the local authorities would ultimately address mental issues of individuals. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of creating a proper balance between the modern and traditional mass media.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the information revolution by modern mass media far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-03 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-21 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Janabakhshi | 85 | view |
| 2020-03-25 | Cheyi1127 | 81 | view |
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 89
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- A university education is necessary to succeed in a career to what extent to you agree or disagree 88
- What are the positive and negative aspects of the connection to outside world including mobile phone email and social networking 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73400673401 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25002866867 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.362531554 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.818181818 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387115791039 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132901924652 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118176471052 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227134750402 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841159250798 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.