The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002, with projections to 2050.
The bar chart present variations in the proportion of four different countries’ population between 1950 and 2005 and the predicted data in 2050.
Overall, China occupied the leading place in terms of population while Japan was in the last place within a period of a century. All countries witnessed a declining tendency in population except India.
According to the diagram, China represented more than a quarter of the world’s population in 1950 and this figure dropped to approximately 18% in 2002. By comparison, the percentage of India went up from 15% to the same level of China in 2002. It is estimated that the figure for India will exceed that of China, reaching 20% in 2050. When it comes to America and Japan, they both present a downward trend in population. To be precise, America constituted 8% of the global population in 1950 and this figure dropped by around 2% in the next decade. It is predicted that America population will remain steady till 2050. Meanwhile, the proportion of Japan declined constantly from 5% to 2.5% in 2002 and it will plummet to its lowest point in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-25 | ChanChan97 | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-25 | ChanChan97 | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 78
- Mobile phones have made our lives easier anyone can use a mobile phone to answer or make work calls or home calls at any place 7 days a week Do you think this development has more positive effects or negative effects on the individuals and society 78
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their life Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The following line graph shows the changes of average monthly salary and prices of black and white TV in Japanese Yen from 1953 to 1973 84
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8829787234 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77067927568 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2294372166 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276051779076 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101589165384 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674811437544 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180371159325 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720512715027 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.