As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction.
To what extent do you agree with such a procedure?
Have you any reservations?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Cloning of animals has been done since ages to improve the species of animals and improve their breeds. The idea of gaining immortality has always attracted humans and therefore extensive research has been conducted to prolong the life of human beings by replacing the defective organs from human beings clones. Although this idea remains controversial on moral and ethical grounds but it is no more an impossibility in today’s scientifically advanced era. Human cloning is a controversial issue and in this essay I will discuss whether I agree or disagree with this idea.
Beyond any qualms the idea of prolonging the life of our beloved ones is a fairly attractive vision. There are a myriad of logical ideas to support the theory of human cloning. On one hand, there are millions of children who die due to congenital birth defects. Making human clones for providing spare parts will give them a chance to live life. For example, congestive heart failure is caused due to a defect in heart ventricles which are unable to pump blood due to hole in heart. In such cases the patient who is born with this defect might be able to live a long life if they receive spare heart from human clones.
On the contrary, many others believe that it is ethically wrong to make human clones as it will disturb the balance of nature. Humans have evolved by the process of natural selection and they has since ages tried to mold the nature according to their own benefits and greed. Since ages this has proved to be harmful for their survival on earth. For example, the recent COVID19 outbreak has again proved that our survival might become threatened when we try to play with the nature and our environment. Therefore, human cloning can prove harmful as it will disturb the balance and ratio between elderly and younger population.
In conclusion, I believe that it is wrong to make human clones as it will disturb the balance of nature and can prove harmful for our future generations. However, will it be utilized to treat birth defects in children? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-26 | ankita.hpgdc | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | ankita.hpgdc | 81 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | adeagboridwan | 92 | view |
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news was reported Use your own ideas knowledge and experi 56
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 67
- Some people believe that countries should produce the food to feed their population themselves and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... fairly attractive vision. There are a myriad of logical ideas to support the theory ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...e process of natural selection and they has since ages tried to mold the nature acc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81792717087 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51404578512 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7276960457 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163531975191 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538261912387 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436017132905 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097948496571 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447150004262 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.