Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the old employees might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the knowledge of younger employees can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, younger employees can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that motivation and having extra energy are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the skills of employees. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both having knowledge and being a skilled worker distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of skills, knowledge, and motivation in the old employees might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the absence of efficiency. Moreover, fundamental aspects of hiring employees can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of skills can pertain to the lack of experience. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of low income were correlated positively with extra payments, the local authorities would ultimately address the age of employees. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of having knowledge and motivation in the job.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of younger employees far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-19 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | lmquan | 92 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | lmquan | 59 | view |
- It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated There are many scholars who study locally Is travel really necessary for a better education 92
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 89
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64137931034 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18812451624 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.021733996 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.727272727 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341630739827 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113748691999 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805965497965 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180773843264 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087335164843 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.