The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050
The column chart illustrates the proportions of the population in the four countries named India, China, America, and Japan from 1950, 2002, and predicts these percentages in 2050.
Overall, while the figure for Indian in 1950 was the lowest, that in the rest was consistently the highest. In addition, throughout this period, the percentages of the Japanese population was the smallest.
As can be seen from the column chart, the majority of people in the world belonged to Chinese in 1950, at just over 23%, which was followed by India, at nearly 15%. The third one was the proportion of Americans (approximately 7%), which was around twice times as high as that of the population in Japan this year (just under 5%). Also, the percentage of Chinese people experienced a significant decline by about 3% from 1950 to 2002. Next came Indians, which made up nearly 17%. Consequently, there were only roughly 5% and 3% of the population in the USA and Japan respectively.
Regarding the future data, in 2050, the highest figure of people will go to India, at over 17% and the second-highest will be in China, which will be about 7% as low as India. Nevertheless, between 2002 and 2050, the proportion of American will be predicted to stay constant, while that in Japan will decrease by about 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 92 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view |
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 61
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 50
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82882882883 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76600051825 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7401485383 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178221293163 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751082735163 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637780805676 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127137043502 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733843961868 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.