In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

In this modern era, along with the rapid development of science and technology, people, especially bookaholics, have wider choices to read a book or newspaper. Now citizens get informations almost by portable devices rather than absorbing them from printed paperback. According to many people, internet newspaper and books will replace the traditional ones.

From my perspectives, the replacement is going to certainly take place, but the production of printed reading materials will not disappeare. The convenience and quickness of online texts are unquestionable. In daily rountine, within smart phones, tablet, residents can access to any news and knowledge regardless of distance or languages. Furthermore, bookaholics are happier while they are available to reach bestseller novels on the internet library and electrical commerical mall in one click, without waiting for a long time as before. In addition, companies fabricated some special devices that embed many technology for protecting customers from harmful effects of mobile displays, giving them better experiences for surfing online. The advent of internet and ebooks has really made a big change in the way people read.

On the other hand, hardpacks still play their significiant role in our life. In academic activies, student prefer real books and notebooks, in which they can easily take note or mark in few seconds. Moreover, some researches and scientific articles require flip back and forth many times, and the printed edition is the best choice to do this task. Beside the academic usage, hard documents also are the way when governments want to announce official news.

In conclusion, ebooks and online newspapers, magazines might be more benificial and convinient in most aspect of social life, but government, student, professors, teachers still buy printed paperback for their purposes.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun technology seems to be countable; consider using: 'many technologies'.
Suggestion: many technologies
...ricated some special devices that embed many technology for protecting customers from harmful e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57192982456 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89645669271 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708771929825 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.746221063 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185910464179 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519153385007 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396293741011 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985523152815 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226657509096 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.