British Emigration to selected destinations from 2004 – 2007 (presented in a bar chart).
The given bar graph compares the proportional change over a period of 4 years in the context of British people who immigrated to a different country out of 5 selected locations(Australia, Spain, New Zealand, USA, and France).
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of Britishers chose Australia as their favorite destination, followed next by Spain. Although records of France and the USA have shown few fluctuations, the preference for New Zealand witnessed a steady drop down over time.
According to the given illustration, with more than 40 thousand British immigrations, Australia led the entire chart in 2004, dipped a little over 1 year period, before marking 2006 as the peak value year of over 50 thousand immigrants as against 43k by the end of the period. Whilst Spain leveled off at 35k British immigrations during the first two years, the proportion slipped down by nearly 5k in the following years.
The USA and France observed a few upward and downward trends, as the former ranged between 25k to 20k immigrants, while the latter rose significantly by 10k in 2005 after which it plummeted down by nearly half(17k) in 2007. On the contrary, a slow downfall plunged the number for New Zealand to as low as 20k in the final year, compared to 25k in 2004, and remained at the least position for Britishers.
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00873362445 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91950709401 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650655021834 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2799820084 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.857142857 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135618952574 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545462337162 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359075386738 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754538611774 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024494342007 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.