You need to study climate change. Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why? Use examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of "you need to study climate change" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that different aspects of climate change might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the study of global warming can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the weather standpoint, the study of climate change can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that forecasting the weather conditions and the pattern of clouds are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of climate change. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both having rainy days and using the sunlight distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of climate science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of paying attention to the study of climate change might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of global warming. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the study of climate change can relate to the reality that the demerits of greenhouse gas emissions can pertain to burning fossil-fuels. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of rising the levels of seas were correlated positively with melting icebergs, the local authorities would ultimately address the atmosphere problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of using renewable energy.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the study of climate change far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-04 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Alireza.r.m | 71 | view |
| 2020-12-12 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Pavitra Kumari | 85 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
- If Voting is compulsory in democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 88
- In education is to learn life values and ethics as important to learn practical skills for future development 77
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some students choose university near where they live and continue to stay at home with families other students choose university away from family what is the advantages and disadvantages for both sides 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63157894737 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09817607361 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7096014962 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359373832513 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115337691838 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798970002736 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196443806917 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525072827725 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.