Internet technology means people no longer need to travel to foreign countries to understand how they live. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people agree that advances in Internet technology help people to acquire new knowledge about other nation's customs and cultural identities so that they do not have to travel abroad anymore. However, I consider that traveling to foreign countries could bring other benefits that the Internet could not do.
On the one hand, Internet technology tends to provide a wide range of information about a lot of countries all around the world. Several videos on YouTube have a topic about traveling to other countries. For example, an abroad student whose name To Ton Thanh has made some videos about his life in Korea. His channel enables many people to have a good grasp of Korean customs and culture. Besides, a manifold of articles in the online news which are updated frequently gives us information about several aspects of other countries such as education, economy, tourism.
On the other hand, I believe that traveling abroad could bring several benefits. Not only acquire new knowledge, but traveling also enables people to meet new friends and built strong relationships with others. Traveling helps people to exert their friend circle and create memorable moments together. Moreover, traveling abroad may be an ideal way to escape from the hustle and bustle of daily life. People are likely to relieve stress and tension after a hard-working period. Traveling gives them a chance to recharge their energy and enjoy their life so that they may work more productively when they come back to work.
In conclusion, although Internet technology enables people to know how people in other countries live, I believe traveling still brings several benefits to our lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52286258844 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2377097769 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256354553448 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866286491917 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775335138442 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186618547738 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894783554367 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.