The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007.
The supplied bar charts compare how many people living in both urban and rural areas were influenced by the four distinct groups of noise pollution during the daytime and the nighttime in 2007
Overall, more inhabitants in cities were disturbed by noises than the rustic villagers, mostly caused by the traffic. Besides, conspicuously, citizens were annoyed more excessively in the daytime.
During the daytime, traffic noise affected 64 million urban citizens and 34 million villagers, whereas 48 million individuals living in cities were interrupted, doubling the number of inhabitants in rustic areas. Influencing much less severely, train noise disturbed 10 million and 8 million people in both estates in the daytime, up to 2 million in each group at night.
In terms of the remaining two sources, fewer inhabitants were bothered. Apparently, the noise from aircraft just affected under 4 million city residents during a day, compared to below 1 million of those who were affected by industry. Furthermore, a tiny fraction of residents in villages were annoyed by aircraft and industry noises.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | Pdtrinh | 68 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | Huy Vu | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | nuvuong98 | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | Vicky Phan | 84 | view |
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people think advertising may have positive economic effects Other think it has social effects because individuals are not satisfied with who they are and what they have Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 84
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 84
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, furthermore, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38150289017 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82695010526 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0618461093 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304884327367 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121961171559 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899837048507 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176118757598 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599319489094 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.