In many workplaces, online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In a large number of organisation, communicate with others by internet become public more than see in person. This essay I shed light on positive aspect and negative aspect.
On the one hand, internet become growing lead to a better quality life of people who can talk with many everyone around the world or in their country. Online communication foster development in economy as faster and easy to work or study. As an exemplar for this, Corona make many pupils should take homework and assignment by distance study with their lecturers. In addition, distance communication is very helpful for others who busy and do not have much time to go on transport due to sometime have a huge amount of problem when they move to there.
On the other hand, in many situations everyone should meet face to face since it is easy to discuss a trouble issue or significant issue. It also provide us knowledge how to behave with people around them. Sit in front of the computer or their phone make them have a problem with eyes. For example, when they have a seminar or workshop take four to five hours look at screen, after that they will feel like their eyes content a few gain.
In conclusion, to be honest, I think interact with people by online is comfortable and flexible for every one than go to somewhere to meet others.
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
In a large number of organisation, communicate with others b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun everyone seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much everyone', 'a good deal of everyone'.
Suggestion: much everyone; a good deal of everyone
...uality life of people who can talk with many everyone around the world or in their country. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...ble issue or significant issue. It also provide us knowledge how to behave with people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun gain seems to be countable; consider using: 'few gains'.
Suggestion: few gains
...hey will feel like their eyes content a few gain. In conclusion, to be honest, I thin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65384615385 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49789523497 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619658119658 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4277792082 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175773851952 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063210770238 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596399555293 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998136789266 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100462256505 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.