The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram depicts the process of electricity production by using natural resources and encourage people to make it by own self rather than buying.
Overall, the graph illustrates manufacturing process of electricity in six steps by using various kinds of machinery equipments to convert methane gas of natural sources into electrical energy.
Turning to the picture for more details, at first, we need to fill with steel tank in 3/4 with some compost such as leaves, food, scraps and so on and water. The tank has connected with four tubes. The tubes are using to gas excretion from the steel tank which being produced by all mixture of composts. Then, the methane gas has been stored in glass bottle. From the glass jar, the collected gas is sending to the compressor.
After being compressed, the gas go out through pipe to the combustion engine. By this engine the gas turn out as a mechanical energy. The energy has to transfer into a generator to convert in electrical energy form. Furthermore, electrical energy are being stored at battery, which use at home for electric power supplies.
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, then, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94054054054 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63801505829 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7824223542 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0546251084363 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021320078927 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358414208275 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398818318822 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413537906538 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.