The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas
The pie chart compares the percentage of people residing in Australia who come from different countries. Meanwhile, the table illustrates the proportion of the population living in different areas.
It is immediately apparent that Australian people account for most of Australia's population, and living in the city is the most popular choice by people in Australia.
Looking at the pie chart, Australian people account for nearly three-quarters of Australia’s population, at 73%. The percentages of people from the UK and New Zealand are much lower, at 7% and 3%, respectively. The figures for people from China and Dutch are lowest, at 2% and 1%. The other nationality accounts for 14%.
Looking at the table, it is clear that living in the city is the most popular choice for Chinese people, 99% of people choosing, whereas only 1% lived in the countryside. A similar picture is evident in the figures for people from Australia, Dutch, the UK, and New Zealand, with their urban population amounting to a high of 80 - 90%.
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 67
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 67
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 71
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 70
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ina and Dutch are lowest, at 2% and 1%. The other nationality accounts for 14%. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11494252874 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93785548443 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5978722802 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132824987577 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687320911101 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726915177028 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111868574264 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100384165864 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.