It is generally believed that rewards should be given to individuals who excel at school. While this thinking may be valid to a certain extent, I would argue that it is better for schools to reward those who show progress in their study as well.
It is understandable why some people advocate rewarding the elite students exclusively. The key rationale in favor of this view is that these students have applied themselves to attain the best performance, and thus it is sensible that their efforts earn them the praises and privileges over those with lesser achievements. However, this policy may have an adverse effect on the rest of the students. Because only a small number of smart individuals can top exams, other students may feel overwhelmed and gradually become disheartened. The implication of this is that they may lose the incentive to study, and the overall performance of the school may deteriorate.
Instead of the aforementioned approach, I am of the opinion that not only outstanding students but also those who aspire to better performance should be rewarded. This would incentivize all students to be diligent in their study and promote healthy competition in the school, which would be of direct benefit to everybody’s progress. My university class perfectly exemplifies this principle. Every time a student gets a higher grade than in the previous exams, he or she will be praised in front of the whole class. This form of encouragement gives everybody a sense of accomplishment and they endeavor to study harder as a result.
In conclusion, while there may be reasons to support only rewarding the best students, I believe schools must also reward those who show signs of improvement.
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinions 61
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinions 80
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage c 78
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creativ 67
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creativ 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... the rest of the students. Because only a small number of smart individuals can top exams, other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08156028369 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9699973504 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8181380585 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168235267624 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572706274193 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454420906399 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961174679536 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354335156012 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... the rest of the students. Because only a small number of smart individuals can top exams, other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08156028369 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9699973504 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8181380585 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168235267624 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572706274193 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454420906399 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961174679536 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354335156012 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.