The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The diagram below depicts the transformation of an inhabitant island to a highly developed resort with convenient recreational facilities and housing services.
As it could be noticed from the map, before the changes the island lacked the infrastructure and mostly was covered by the palm trees. The only facility on hand was the beach in the north, unsuitable for swimming. As a result of changes there erected main housing options in the midst of the island as well as additional one-family houses circling the palm trees from the north of the beach, constructed to meet the demand for residential space. Besides that, planners built the Reception building to provide check-ins and check-outs to the visitors in the area between two accommodation spaces, that had been previously empty.
The next changes are not less significant. Firstly, the pier, the purpose of which was to transport guests from the insular resort and back via boats, connected to the main reception building by the vehicle track appeared in the south of the island. Secondly, the ill-equipped beach turned into a convenient swimming facility with a walking path to guest houses. Finally, the developers situated the restaurant overlooking the north seashore adjacent to the Reception.
Overall, under the aforementioned changes, the previously wild and inhabitant island turned into an advanced recreational area better serving the visitors.
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 84
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 84
- THE GLOBAL DEMAND FOR OIL AND GAS IS INCREASING SOME BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD THEREFORE ENCOURAGE THE EXPLOITATION OF REMOTE AREAS DO THE ADVANTAGES OF THIS OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES 78
- The charts below show the proportions of the world s oil resources held in different areas together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, as to, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4009009009 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92969108382 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603603603604 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1326581982 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176952368476 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589624053617 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512876764499 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104401475984 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048687172459 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.