Some believe children should not be allowed to go outside without adult supervision post curfew time. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Over the years, the world has become a much safer place, at least in terms of crimes. With a myriad of security cameras and police service, the people with malign intentions have been brought down. While the crime rates such as thievery, murder, and looting have gone down, it is still not completely eradicated. However, restraining kids against their wishes is conservative in nature and can prove futile in many aspects.
Firstly, young people must be encouraged to become self-reliant and mature at a very early age. The greatest people known to humankind such as Albert Einstein, Abraham Lincoln, travelled long distances on foot when they were young. Being dependent on parents for everything, may not fall in line with desired leadership capabilities. To achieve greater good, one must be allowed to work on their own. In 21st century, with sophisticated technology and secure protocols in place, it is much safer to travel outside during late evening.
Secondly, sometimes students may need to visit their friends to work on a project. Adults must ensure proper instructions are given to their offsprings to take care of themselves. Merely denying the right and opposing their requests can be disastrous. Monitoring a person all the while and taking away their freedom, would only force them to leave and lead a separate life. Hence, timings to go outside must be made more flexible with proper precautions.
To summarise, an extent of easiness in norms must be provided to allow youngsters roam out of home at night. If handled properly, the negative aspects of the situation can be brought under control. As we advance more into the modern world, letting people act on their own can prove to be more beneficial.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65035195675 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657342657343 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4085558845 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.7647058824 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127673763301 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409678563826 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461941281422 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743487921466 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262822589539 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.