In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the best way to solve the problem by providing schools and teachers. Some others think that it is better to provide computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your opinion
The widespread problem of whether facilities and tutors or the Internet contribute a better part in children’ education has emerged as a topic of deeply-ingrained concern. It is my firm belief that both ways carry along with its merits and demerits
To begin with, plenty of advocates are inclined towards the positive side of computers in this phenomenon. Firstly, due to its accessible and convenience figures, using the Internet as a learning method would be understandable in the context of remote areas with its far-distancing and strict weather conditions. In addition, affordable price in building the Internet network would prevent government from exerting a profound impact on the state budget. In the contrast, there are also strong arguments against this phenomenon. Theoretical and practical are seemingly the two main factors which contributing to one’s knowledge in a specific sector. As an inevitable consequence, lacking of experiment would act as a deterrent for students to be fully informed of their lessons.
On the other hand, there are also well-grounded for which facilities and instructors are preferred. Firstly, real-life interactions is of paramount importance in laying a foundation for student to keep up with their academic materials. Furthermore, up-to-a-minute responds from instructors would be far more effective, compared with online discussion which is occasionally interrupted by the Internet connection. By contrast, an insufficient number of tutors is seems to be a biggest concern. As the world develops, a fewer teachers are employed due to the fact that graduators have the propensity to gain more prospective employment. Therefore, a worse quality of teachers is dispensed to rural areas as an adverse effect.
To sum up, it is imperative to thoroughly examine strengths and weaknesses of both ways to improve the current situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-29 | letcallmemit | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | lamquang1809 | 67 | view |
- Many people think it is very important to protect the environment but they make no effort to do it themselves Why is the case What actions can be done to encourage individuals to protect the environment 74
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the main source for the majority of people To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the main source for the majority of people To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the best way to solve the problem by providing schools and teachers Some others think that it is better to provide computers and Internet access D 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ficient number of tutors is seems to be a biggest concern. As the world develops,...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, in addition, in fact, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52249134948 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28056150488 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60553633218 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1337971788 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101858677126 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303955061603 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333685610876 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607123841455 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321821772374 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.