The graphs below give information about the performance of the trains in a train company in October and November in 2008
The line graphs illustrate the proportions of the trains that were late and cancelled in a particular train company in both October and November in the year 2008.
Overall, there were constant fluctuations in the percentages of late trains and cancelled ones. In addition, while there were more trains running late in November, cancelled trains generally occurred in October.
In the first week of October, there were 20% of trains behind the schedule, followed by a slight increase of 10% in the following week. Afterward, its figure experienced a remarkable decrease to 10% until the beginning of November. Then, the figure for late trains suddenly rose to reach its peak of approximately 55% before seeing a drop to fairly 35% in the third week of the month.
In comparison, only one tenth of the total train routes were cancelled at the beginning of October, which then steeply climbed to 70% in just seven days and fell back to where it started in the next week. Then, the percentage of trains that did not operate saw upward fluctuations until the third week of November, ending at 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-20 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 78
- The diagram below shows how salt is removed from sea water to make it drinkable 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 91
- The graphs below give information about the performance of the trains in a train company in October and November in 2008 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66030719323 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.459215023 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2360857295 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116573086574 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115212633446 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180809771302 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130922413835 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.