The given table details the report showing how much waste(in millions of tonnes) is produced by six different countries over a period of 20 years from 1980 to 2000.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the United States was by far the biggest contributor, followed next by Japan. Besides this, Ireland and Portugal witnessed a lower amount of waste.
According to the given illustration, in 1980, the United States contributed the highest amount of waste(131 million tonnes), compared to one-fifth by Japan and merely 0.6, 4, 2 units by Ireland, Poland, and Portugal respectively. By contrast, Korea reported zero waste disposal in the same year.
Over a decade, whilst the United States observed a dramatic rise of about 20 million tonnes as against 4 million tonnes in Japan, just a million tonnes of increment was noticed in Poland, and Portugal, compared to Ireland, which reduced to zero. Besides, Korea reported 31 million tonnes of waste in the same year. Further, In 2000, the United States climbed to a peak of 192 million tonnes, while Japan moved up by another 20 million tonnes. On the other hand, although Ireland, Poland, and Japan recorded a slight uptick of nearly a tonne, Korea dropped below 20 million tonnes by the period end.
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years 74
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 59
- The maps show the change in Pentland from 1980 to 2007 77
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 89
- The chart below shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles traveled PMT by transportation type in 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99086757991 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53453863141 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557077625571 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4118421779 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.444444444 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331069736935 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138982603629 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10613609779 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203574308335 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1257644767 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.