Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people believe that today traditional and religious festivals became meaningless. All that one wants to see there is something vivid and thrilling, without getting into history, without remembering and respecting the past of their country and nation. Personally, I suppose that it is a wrong point of view. In my opinion, people can enjoy themselves and respect the traditions or their nation at a time.
Traditional festivals all over the world teach people humanity, morality and ethnics. Firstly, with nowadays technologies those festivals and concerts became a great deal more interesting to observe. So, people have started to visit them more often and started to know about their culture and history more. Secondly, such events make people closer. They show all the beauty and individuality of the country, nation and traditions. As an example we can take international spring holidays in Ukraine such as Maslenitsa and Easter. There are many traditions which people still respect. For instance, making pankakes on Maslenitsa and going to church with Easter basket fulled with eggs and pie on Easter.
Concerning remembering traditions, today, in modern society some people have forgotten or did not know the history of their nation. Nevertheless, it cannot be said that today it is absolutely meaningless or forgotten because many people, especially older generation, tries to give us all the information that they have got. Moreover, they are doing a huge job to make it widespread and respected, those organize festivals, concerts and other events to promote traditional and religious holidays.
To summarise, it is definetly true that many people have forgotten their history but it does not mean that ones go to those festivals only to enjoy themselves. Because traditional and religious holidays are important and many people try to make them more popular and share their knowledge with others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-13 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | phamanhtu | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | adoke | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | yavarmohammadi | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 61
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y older generation, tries to give us all the information that they have got. More...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they have got. Moreover, they are doing a huge job to make it widespread and res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i suppose, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34105960265 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81425202728 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8623773373 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8823529412 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290521321302 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948463333656 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745280103996 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185229023095 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474236139318 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.